North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2003

Adams v. Dayco Prod.

Adams v. Dayco Prod.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided May 9, 2003 · <center> ORDER for the Full Commission by CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, Commissioner, N.C. Industrial Commission, with LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC, Commissioner, Dissenting in Part.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Wallace Graham; Salisbury, North Carolina; Michael B. Pross, counsel of record. Defendants: Brooks, Stevens Pope; Cary, North Carolina; Michael C. Sigmon, counsel of record. Lewis Roberts; Raleigh, North Carolina; Winston L. Page, counsel of record. Teague, Campbell, Dennis Gorham; Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas M. Clare, counsel of record. McAngus, Goudelock Courie; Raleigh, North Carolina; Andrew R. Ussery, counsel of record.

Adams v. Dayco Prod.

Opinion of the Court

***********
This matter is before the undersigned on Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Full Commission administrative panel's 11 April 2003 Order.

After careful study and thorough consideration, Defendants' Motion for reconsideration is HEREBY DENIED. The 11 April 2003 Order remains in full force and effect.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________________ THOMAS JEFFERSON BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.