North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2008

Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy

Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Decided July 31, 2008 · <center> ORDER for the Full Commission by DIANNE C. SELLERS, Commissioner, N.C. Industrial Commission.</center>

Counsel

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se . Defendants: Dickie, McCamey Chilcote, P.C., Charlotte, North Carolina; Sarah DiFranco, appearing.

Romero v. Cvs Pharmacy

Opinion of the Court

* * * * * * * * * * *
Pursuant to Rule 701 of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Rules, plaintiff's grounds for appeal "must be stated with particularity, including the specific errors allegedly committed by the Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner." Rule 701. "The penalty for non-compliance with the particularity requirement is waiver of grounds, and, where no grounds are stated, the appeal is abandoned." Wade v.Carolina Brush Mfg. Co., ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 652 S.E.2d 713, 715 (2007); citing Roberts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 173 N.C. App. 740, 744,619 S.E.2d 907, 910 (2005).

Plaintiff's failure to file or articulate any statement of grounds for her appeal does not constitute a mere failure to strictly comply with Rule 701. Rather, plaintiff's failure constitutes *Page 2 total noncompliance with a fundamental rule of the Industrial Commission. Such noncompliance cannot be waived under Rule 801 and disregards defendants' fundamental right to notice of the grounds for plaintiff's appeal. Wade v. Carolina Brush Mfg. Co., supra.

As such, plaintiff's appeal to the Full Commission is hereby DISMISSED.

This 16th day of July, 2008.

S/___________________

DIANNE C. SELLERS

COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/___________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

S/___________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

*Page 1

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.