Superior Court of North Carolina, 1791

Simpson v. . Crawford

Simpson v. . Crawford
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided September 5, 1791 · The Court, ASHE, J., SPENCER, J., and WILLIAMS, J., made no observation, but permitted the <italic>capias</italic> to be altered.
1 N.C. 32

Counsel

Jones , for the plaintiff, moved for leave to alter the capias , which had been returned "executed." He observed that it had been issued by the clerk: that the instrument on which the suit was brought was a deed , and the capias had been filled up in case: while it ought to have been in covenant . The defendant was not in Court, and none of the gentlemen of the bar present, was employed for him.

Simpson v. . Crawford

Opinion of the Court

NOTE. — See, contra, Anonymous, 2 N.C. 401. But see note toCowper v. Edwards, 2 N.C. 19, and the cases there referred to; and also the cases of Johnston v. McGinn, 15 N.C. 277; Grist v. Hodges, 14 N.C. 198;Alston v. Hamlin, 19 N.C. 115; Green v. Deberry, 24 N.C. 344. All amendments, made either by consent or by leave of the Court, ought to appear on the record. Shearin v. Neville, 18 N.C. 3.

(33)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.