Ellis v. . Hetfield

This was objected to by Slade, for the defendant: but And proof having given of the subscribing witness' handwriting:

WILLIAMS, J., required that the signature of the defendant should also be proved.

HAYWOOD, J., tacente.

It was accordingly done, and the plaintiff had a verdict.

NOTE. — See the note to Hamilton v. Williams, 2 N.C. 139, and the cases there referred to, and also the case of Saunders v. Ferrill,23 N.C. 97.

Cited: Ballard v. Ballard, 75 N.C. 192.

(72)