Den on the demise of Sandifer v. Foster

Per curiam,

after argument — the river in this case, must be considered as the boundary of Gee’s patent — it has always been thus uniformly decided in our courts.

The jury found accordingly, and there was judgment, accordingly' — Baker for Plaintiff, Keys for Defendant.

Note. — Vide Hartsfield v. Westbrook, post 258—note to Bradford v. Hill, ante 22.