Mushrow v. . Graham
Mushrow v. . Graham
2 N.C. 361
Opinion of the Court
It is the common practice to receive the depositions of all such public officers, the duties of whose offices oblige them to attend at a particular place for the discharge thereof. Let the deposition be read. *Page 281
He proved the execution of the bond by Graham, but did not say that Graham, the defendant in this action, was the person who executed it.
Addendum
You may identify the defendant by proof of his handwriting.
The plaintiff then proved the handwriting in which the obligor's name was subscribed to be the handwriting of Graham, the defendant, and he had a verdict and judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.