Superior Court of North Carolina, 1797

Anonymous

Anonymous
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided April 5, 1797 · PER CURIAM.
2 N.C. 485
Anonymous

Opinion of the Court

An express promise, by all the books, will support this action. Some of them say an implied promise will not, because debt for rent is the assigned action. The promise here stated may be taken to have been an express one, as the contrary is not stated in the special case.

The plaintiff had judgment.

Judgments have been given for the plaintiffs upon a quantum meruit, before 2 Geo. II., c. 19; Vide, 3 Mo., 73.

See Hayes v. Acre, 1 N.C. 247.

Cited: Sessoms v. Tayloe, 148 N.C. 373. *Page 389

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.