Superior Court of North Carolina, 1797

Starkey's v. . McClure

Starkey's v. . McClure
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided March 5, 1797 · The Court, WILLIAMS, J., and McCOY, J., allowed the objection.
1 N.C. 83

Counsel

Taylor and Graham for the plaintiffs . Badger and Harris for the defendant .

Starkey's v. . McClure

Opinion of the Court

One of those persons, who had taken a lot of slaves under this division but who was no party to this suit, was introduced on the part of the plaintiffs, to show that such a division by consent had been made.

The defendant's counsel objected to that person being sworn, on the ground of interest, and on argument, NOTE. — See Ferrel v. Perry, ante, 25, and the cases referred to in Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2; and also Kaywood v. Barnett, 20 N.C. 88.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.