Superior Court of North Carolina, 1798

Harrell v. Elliot

Harrell v. Elliot
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided October 15, 1798
3 N.C. 68
Harrell v. Elliot

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

The act does not expressly require the acknowledgment of thpyéwe? to be put into writing, nor to be recorder’, but k requires her acknowledgment to be in court, and to be taken by a member of the court, appointed to examine; and what is done in court cannot be Otherwise proven than by the records of the court, and therefore the evidence offered cannot be admitted.

Verdict for the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.