Superior Court of North Carolina, 1801

Anonymous

Anonymous
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided January 5, 1801 · By the Court.
1 N.C. 182

Counsel

Harris for the plaintiff . Woods for the defendant .

Anonymous

Opinion of the Court

Assumpsit on notes of hand. The defendant pleads in abatement of the writ, that when it was sued out he was an inhabitant of and resident in the district of Wilmington; that the plaintiff was an inhabitant of the State of Tennessee, and that the parties continue to reside in the said places respectively — wherefore the defendant says he is not bound to answer the writ out of the district of Wilmington. Replication — that William McKenzie, who lives in the county of Beaufort and district of New Bern, is the holder and owner of the notes on which the suit is brought, and the real plaintiff in the suit, making use of Blount's name only for the purpose of recovering; and that he was, previously to the commencement of the suit, known and acknowledged by the defendant to be the real owner of the note, and entitled to the money due thereon; and was treated with by the defendant for the discharge of the notes.

Addendum

Demurrer and joinder. There are cases where a Court of law has taken notice of equities and trusts for the furtherance of justice; to enable a defendant to set-off a debt due from the person beneficially interested, though no party to the record, and for the purpose of avoiding the plea of bankruptcy. I think the principle may be adopted with equal propriety to avoid a plea to the jurisdiction of the Court, grounded on the act of Assembly, for it stands admitted on these pleadings that Blount is but nominally the plaintiff.

Demurrer overruled. *Page 162

(183)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.