Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Superior Court of North Carolina, 1805

Gee v. . Warwick

Gee v. . Warwick
Superior Court of North Carolina · Decided July 5, 1805 · HALL, J.
3 N.C. 354

Counsel

Haywood and Plummer , for the plaintiffs, forebore any such question; but they asked him whether he did not owe as heir to his father or grandfather, and he answered; and his counsel, Mr. Brown , (355) did not object to the question; and he admitted a bond due from his grandfather, and that he had assets from him, not as heir, but as devisee.

Gee v. . Warwick

Opinion of the Court

He cannot be interrogated in that character, unless the Court can be convinced by further argument that the case of Welch v. Gurley, ante, 334, decided not long since at Wilmington, is not law. NOTE. — See Welch v. Gurley, ante, 334.

Cited: Russell v. Hinton, 5 N.C. 473.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.