Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1800

Bright v. . Wilson

Bright v. . Wilson
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided July 5, 1800 · MACAY, J.
1 N.C. 251

Counsel

William Slade for plaintiffs in error .

Bright v. . Wilson

Opinion of the Court

I am of opinion that the judgment of the county court should be affirmed.

Addendum

No special errors are assigned in this case, and I have not, upon a view of the record, been able to discern any; the writ in its substantial parts is conformable to the precedent in the register, and though the judgment does not appear to be rendered according to 6 Ed. 1, for the place wasted, yet that omission being for the defendant's benefit, was not, I presume, intended to be assigned. *Page 217

Addendum

I am also of opinion that the judgment of the county court should be affirmed.

Judgment for defendants in error.

Cited: Dozier v. Gregory, 46 N.C. 104.

NOTE. — See Ballentine v. Poyner, 3 N.C. 110, and the cases referred to in the note.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.