Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1800

Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons

Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 15, 1800 · Johnston, MacAy, Taylor
1 N.C. 24

Counsel

William Slade, Attorney for Plaintiffs in error.

Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons

Opinion of the Court

Johnston, Judge

I am of opinion that the judgment of the County Court should be affirmed.

Taylor, Judge

No special errors are assigned in this case, and I have not upon a view of the record been able to discern any; the writ in its substantial parts is conformable to the precedent in the register, and though the judgment does not appear to be rendered according to 6 Ed. I. for the place wasted, yet that omission being for the defendants benefit, was not, I presume, intended to be assigned.

Macay, Judge

I am also of opinion, that the judgment of the County Court should be affirmed.

Judgment for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.