Bell v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bell v. Bell, 5 N.C. 95 (N.C. 1805)
Hall, Iocke, MacAx, Taxior

Bell v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

Bx macax, taxioR and iocke — Judge

Let the demurrer be overruled with costs.

Hall—Judge

Bell is the plaintiff of record, and the act of 1777, ch. 2, directs that “ where the plaintiff shall reside beyond seas, or in a different state, the ¿hit shall be brought to the court of the district where the *96defendant resides, and where suit is brought otherwise than is therein directed, it may be abated, on the jilea of the do Pendant.” A court of law will not take notice of. the trust between Anthony Bell and Joshua Bell, and recognize tin-latter as plaintiff when the record declares that the former jg plaintiff

Reference

Full Case Name
Arthur Bell v. Benjamin Bell
Status
Published