Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1827

Barnes v. . Dickinson

Barnes v. . Dickinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 5, 1827 · Hax
12 N.C. 346
Barnes v. . Dickinson

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hax.Ii, Judge.

It does not appear that Cooke had such an interest in the cause as to render him incompetent.

As to what Rebecca Hicks tol$ the Plaintiff, relative to her deposition, he had ample time to avail himself of it (if that could be done) on the trial ¿ he might also then have objected to her deposition, because it was in the handwriting of Cooke, if that objection would have availed him. I think the Judge did right in not granting a new trial for these reasons.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.