Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1829

Dunett v. . Barksdale

Dunett v. . Barksdale
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided December 5, 1829 · HALL, J. (after stating the case as above.)
13 N.C. 252

Dunett v. . Barksdale

Opinion of the Court

FROM SURRY. From this statement of facts it appears that the rights of the parties litigant depended upon a question reserved; and that question was submitted to this Court for its decision. To decide for either of the parties, when that question can not be understood, would be to decide in the dark without regard to their rights. To get clear of this difficulty we can take but one course, and that is to grant a new trial; by which means the question *Page 160 may be again made, if those concerned think proper. This has been heretofore done. Hatton v. Dew, 4 N.C. 137.

PER CURIAM. New Trial.

Cited: Brown v. Kyle, 47 N.C. 443.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.