Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1847

Merrill v. . McMinn

Merrill v. . McMinn
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided August 5, 1847 · DANIEL, J.
29 N.C. 344

Counsel

N.W. Woodfin for plaintiff . J. W. Woodfin and Francis for defendants .

Merrill v. . McMinn

Opinion of the Court

It is very certain that the objection would have been held good had it not been for the act of the General Assembly at its Session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance that the constable's bond was taken by a court composed of only three magistrates makes no difference, since the passage of the aforesaid act of Assembly. S. v. Pool, 27 N.C. 105.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Magnin, 86 N.C. 289. *Page 243

(346)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.