State Ex Rel. McCall v. . the Justices of Anson
State Ex Rel. McCall v. . the Justices of Anson
Opinion of the Court
At ANSON, on the last Spring Circuit, his Honor, Ellis, J., awarded alternative writs of mandamus to each of the realtors, from which order the defendants prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was granted.
The appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. When the case was before this Court, at June Term, 1850 (see
When the case was returned to that court, the defendants were permitted again to show cause why a mandamus should not issue, the parties treating it, as if it were an application for a peremptory mandamus in the first instance. The rule indeed did call the writ required a peremptorymandamus, and the court, as well as the parties, seemed (303) to view it in that light; but the irregularity was cured by the order made by the court, that a writ of alternative mandamus should issue. To that, the realtors were clearly entitled, as had already been decided in this Court, and no appeal could be properly taken from such order. This is manifest from the consideration that the very same question is now before us as was decided on the former appeal — to wit, whether the realtors are entitled to the writ of alternative mandamus, which is always the first process, as distinguished from a rule to show cause, in a proceeding of this kind. 3 Black. Com., 111; Tapping on Mandamus, *Page 286
6; 1 Rev. Stat., chap. 97, sections 3, 4, 5; Delacy v. Neuse NavigationCompany,
The case being now improperly before us upon the appeal of the defendants, it must be dismissed at their costs, which will be certified to the Superior Court, from which the writ of alternative mandamus must issue, as heretofore ordered by that court.
PER CURIAM. Dismissed accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.