Zachary v. . Holden

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Zachary v. . Holden, 47 N.C. 453 (N.C. 1855)
Peaeson

Zachary v. . Holden

Opinion of the Court

Peaeson, J.

Allen v. Greenlee, 2 Dev. 370, is a direct authority in support of the decision made in the Court below.

The same principle is applied to a converse state of facts, Rodgers v. Pitman, 2 Jones 56. The two cases settle the rule to be, that where process is valid and sued out maliciously, the proper action is case; where the process is void, as for *454 want of jurisdiction, the proper action is trespass vi eb a/rmis or trover.

Pee CueiaM. Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Alexander Zachary v. . Isaac Holden.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published