Sloan v. Mendenhall
Opinion of the Court
John S. Dare on ti e death of.bis mother became the owner of the hoce and lot, in ice simple, as her heir at law subject to a power of sale by her adminis--trator in the event, that a sale was necessary for the pay-mem of her debts.
Die plaintiff? by the suits and judgments'undeT their at-tachmer.is, acquired a Hen on the hcu<-e and fot, and but for V c cerche of the power of sale by the administrator cf Mm. .VPtehell, tlmy would ! a?*:- been m-tiCcd to have the house and In' told tor the payin'-nt of thair debts. Havii.<? been <?op dved "f tins right at lew, by the sale of the rdmirblrstor. the <p;c.eJon is, whether they are not entitled in j, <'•; hit ofe-mity to if ¡low the innd in the bands of the who:nisir, for, and he e if oppliwl in disdiarge of their debts, a few 'fedfifeiry ¡be io-iount1 pplied by the ad~ inlnisUvbv in p iVi-cnf «T d;c deh-ia r?h'-. ir.tr afrie.
"We 0 ink the .-^uify ;) eh-.-í ■-.no. The pfe.inhffa lu¡d ac-ai-d bji-vo ;.n uy 1 'improperly v;r to ¡he crb'.h.V: (joven .. '.¡or iv.k.’hL l.i t!\:; j 1 .. t 1-c. .. lije V. ’V *y.t her. (S' fee v Tiffs br.\ h- - h -d i:e rlcb. (lei'i-sub-'.t 1 >: handy of tb.o udmhds'r.dor, Bueh, or a-, the ey nl of IX ’ • la-l'u'a t d ficm the ;;:‘d ~rfor : ever v.liich ? t o? the cater. The 1 co, it fci'os, e -jliat the ■’irpoao of the fund in the bad the a«h;rh.h;i.raior as r-y right to vial.a an application of the teed rern'-dning in Ida luvuds, after discharging t.he.debf-: of. iris intestate.
It is pv-.-peily conceded that the deed executed by Dare to It, M. Lindsay is of no effect, and it is equally dear that the plaintiffs' J and II. £Hoan me not estopped by receiving
There will be a reference to ascertain this amount and show the sama to which the plaintiffs are respectively entitled» ' * •
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.