Patrick v. Carr
Patrick v. Carr
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer raises the question, whether the jurisdiction of a Court of Equity can be invoked, to compel a Sheriff who has sold land under ’ an execution (tbe judgment and execution and ’ sale being in all respects regular) to execute a deed to tbe purchaser, who offers, and has always been ready to pay the purchase money ; in other words, to compel a Sheriff to do Ms duty., This-has hitherto been considered tbe exclusive function of tbe Court, under whose authority be acted in making tbe sale. We are at a loss to conceive under what bead of equity tbis jurisdiction is supposed to be embraced, in tbe absence of an argument in support of .the equity of tbe bill, or of any reference to a precedent for the-exercise.of tbe jurisdiction. The purchaser has a plain, and an adequate, and .a speedy. remedy at law, by putting tbe Sheriff under a rule.
But there is no allegation that there was a deed to him. So, he has not acquired the legal title, and there, is no ground for equity, to assume jurisdiction, in order to convert him into a trustee.
Demurrer sustained, and hill dismissed with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- JOHN W. PATRICK and FRANKLIN THOMAS v. ELIAS CARR and HOOKERTON FEMALE INSTITUTE
- Status
- Published