Goodson v. Caldwell
Goodson v. Caldwell
Opinion of the Court
Previous to the act of lYth February, 1864, entitled “ an act to organize forces to serve for the war,” the petitioner was exempt by reason .oí his being a blacksmith. This exemption- being repealed by that act, he became liable to military duty, but was not enrolled until the 2nd of October.' In the meanwhile — that is, between the passage of the act and the enrolment — he reached the age of 45 years. The enrolment and arrest are for duty in the army generally, and not-as.a Senior Resérve; °
We have had occasion at. this term to declare in several cases, (as m that of.Upchurch, and others,) that the act of INh February does not, of itself, operate as an enrolment, something more being required to put a citizen in military service. This being so, it follows that if the citr-izen, at the time he is called for, be not liable to perform the service required, he cannot bo rightfully enrolled and' made to serve.
He is entitled to relief therefore, from his present custody, and will stand subject to duty in the corps of senior reserves.
He is discharged accordingly. The officer to pay costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MILES GOODSON v. J. D. CALDWELL
- Status
- Published