Sloan v. Mendenhall
Opinion of the Court
John 8. Dare on ihe death of his mother bec'ame the owner of the house and lot, in fee simple, as her heir ; i law subject to a power of sale by her ¡administrator in the event, that a sale was necessary for the payment ofher debts. •
The plaintiffs by the pulls and judgments under their attachments, a‘quited alien on Ihe house* and lot, raid but for the o* w/m.-e ot the powi-r of 'ride by the administrator of Mrs. M'tehcil. thry won hi have. Leen entitled to have ' the l.o:;: e and Jot t'ohl '(he, paym-vJ. of their debts. Having bom dep ivod of ibis rigid at bnv, by the sale of the admin:: Tab-r, the quc-Ium is, whether they are not, entitled i-> * court nfequih t ’ follow the fund in the hands of the ; ’.h n’niulrsi'.or, ..•?•<! hi; :o it applied in discharge of their debía, nffei deduclin;; i; « unu-ont implied by the ad-rninbtnd or pi uncr*!- of ;].•■ d-bts ofh:s inli’fet&tc.
We third: ihe ;:ity a clear one. Tin- plaint’ffs had uv-ipjiroJ a Lb v and have r.n > qri'y to bo 'choud fioiu (he a'i.ideu.t that the p;r petty \va? --o'd under a j moor which the law gc.-';. to the edtKhib.'rvb.-r oí the. raaestor. The ]*• is of the- piídr.íiff.? having altad cd, it follows that the deffvnh.n! b';r\% hid no light tqdis-pose of the ford in the hand-, of the admb.is'rr.ior,,!;'.'!’ had the administrator as such, or tv- the eger.l cf Dure, v.ry light to male an application of the fund remaining in Lis-bards, after discharging the debts of ft is intestate.
It is prepoily conceded that the. deed executed by Dare to Ib M. Lindsay is of no effect, and it is equally clear that the plaintiffs J and It, Sloan are note-stopped by receiving
There will be a reference to ascertain this amount bud show .the sima 'to which the p'alntife are respectively entitled.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.