Patrick v. Carr
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer raises the question, whether the jurisdiction of a Court of Equity can be invoiced, to compel a Sheriff who-has sold land under an execution (tire judgment and execution and sale being in all respects regular) to execute a deed to the purchaser, who offers, and has always been ready to pay the ‘purchase money ; in other words, to compel a Sheriff to' do his duty. This has hitherto been* considered the exclusive function of the Court,«under whose authority he acted in making the sale. We are at a loss to conceive undef what head of cqwiiy this jurisdiction is supposed to be embraced, in the absence of an argument in support of the equity of the bill, or of any reference to a precedent for the exercise of the jurisdiction. The purchaser has a plain, and an adequate, and a speedy remedy at law, by putting the Sheriff under a rule.
But there is no allegation that there was a deed,to him. So, he has not acquired the legal title, and there is no ground for equity, to assume jurisdiction, in order to convert him into a trustee.
Demurrer sustained, and bill dismissed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.