Waldrop v. . Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Waldrop v. . Green, 63 N.C. 344 (N.C. 1869)
PearsoN

Waldrop v. . Green

Opinion of the Court

PearsoN, C. J.

This case was entered on his docket by the clerk of the Superior Court, according to sec. 400, “ Code of Civil Procedure.” • By sec. 402, it is directed: “The said suits shall be proceeded in and tried under the existing laws and rules applicable thereto.” So we agree with his Honor in his ruling, that the plaintiff had no right to take issue upon the facts set out in the answer, and have such issue *346 submitted to a jury. Before the Court could take any further-action in the cause, we think the motion to dissolve the injunction on bill and answer was properly before the Court for-determination.

We also agree with his Honor, that upon bill and answer the' injunction ought to have been dissolved, indeed we ar& inclined to the opinion that the bill upon its face, has no equity. The injunction was improvidently granted.

Let this be certified, &c.

Per Curiam. Ordered accordingly.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Waldrop v. . Silas M. Green.
Status
Published