Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1875

Von Glahn v. Lattimer

Von Glahn v. Lattimer
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 15, 1875 · Cueiam, Peaeson
73 N.C. 333

Counsel

French and W. S. <& JD. J. Devane, for appellant., Battle cb Son and Strange, contra.

Von Glahn v. Lattimer

Opinion of the Court

PeaesoN, C. J.

It is held in Ton Glahn v. Harris, at this term that all of the creditors of the bank are necessary parties plaintiff, and must be made plaintiffs directly, or by construction, in an action in the names of one or more of the creditors,, in behalf of themselves and all of the other creditors who may come in and take part in the proceedings, prove their debts, &c.

That point of law was reserved by his Honor and certain issues submitted to a jury. The case goes on one of the points of law. So his ruling upon the issues are superceded.

No error in the judgment.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.