State v. . Earwood
State v. . Earwood
75 N.C. 210
State v. . Earwood
Opinion of the Court
The declarations of one of the alleged conspirators, made in the absence of the others, after the transaction was over, (211) introduced by the State to prove the conspiracy, were clearly incompetent against any one except himself. There is error.
PER CURIAM. Venire de novo.
Cited: S. v. Jackson,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.