Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1876

McCampbell v. . McClung

McCampbell v. . McClung
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 5, 1876 · RODMAN, J.
75 N.C. 392

Counsel

G.S. Ferguson for appellant . J. H. Merrimon, contra .

McCampbell v. . McClung

Opinion of the Court

The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.

Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Case (395) remanded to be proceeded in.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Comrs. v. Maguire, 85 N.C. 117; Gore v. Lewis, 109 N.C. 541;Sharpe v. Eliason, 116 N.C. 667.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.