Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1876

McCampbell v. McClung

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 15, 1876 · Rodman

75 N.C. 393

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

McElroy v. Whitney (Idaho 1906)
Sharpe v. . Eliason (N.C. 1895)
Gore v. . Lewis (N.C. 1891)
State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Wake v. Magnin (N.C. 1881)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Rodman, J.

The exceptions to the report for vagueness and uncertainty must be sustained. The parties are entitled, from the referee, to a statement of all the items of the account between them, in order that either may, if he thinks proper, except to any particular item.

*395Exception to the report for vagueness sustained. Judgment below reversed. Case remanded to be proceeded in, &c. Let this opinion be certified. The plaintiff will recover costs in this court.

Per CuriaM. Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.