Grant v. . Burgwyn
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Page v. . McDonald (N.C. 1912)
- Best v. British & American Co. (N.C. 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants entered a special appearance and moved: (1) To dismiss the action because there *514 was no service of the summons returnable to Fall Term, 1877, and no alias issued. (2) To dissolve the attachment for want of sufficient affidavits. The attachment issued before said Fall Term. In regard to the first motion His Honor after setting out the evidence finds as a fact, that service was had by publication, and on examination of the whole record we think his finding was correct and his refusal of the motion is sustained. In regard to the second motion we are of the same opinion. The affidavit of June the 18th is in the very words of the statute and that must be sufficient. In looking at the whole record it appears "that the statute on this subject has been substantially complied with.
No error. Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.