Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880

State v. . Parish

State v. . Parish
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided June 5, 1880 · Smith
83 N.C. 613

Counsel

Attorney General , for the State. Mr. T. M. Argo , for defendant.

State v. . Parish

Opinion of the Court

Smith, C. J.

We sustain the correctness of the ruling of the court. Such testimony by itself and unconnected with evidence of the defendant’s non-intercourse during the interval necessary to his being the father, or other fact tending to disprove the charge, was held to be insufficient to-overcome the statutory presumption, and by itself incompetent when offered for that purpose, in the case- of the State v. Bennett, 75 N. C., 305, and State v. Britt, 78 N. C., 439, and when offered to impeach the credit of the witness, the matter of the enquiry was held to be collateral and her answer conclusive. State v. Patterson, 74 N. C., 157.

The jurisdiction iu bastardy proceedings is vested by a recent statute (acts 1879, ch. 92,)) exclusively in a justice of the peace, except as to such as were pending at the time of its passage in the superior, criminal, or inferior courts as in the present case.

There is no error and this will be certified to the court, below.

Per Curiam;. No error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.