Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885

University of North Carolina v. State National Bank

University of North Carolina v. State National Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 5, 1885 · Sjiith
92 N.C. 651

Counsel

Messrs. Fuller Snow, Reade, Busbee Busbee, J. W. Hinsdale and E. C. Smith , for the plaintiff. Messrs. D. G. Fowle and G. V. Strong , for the defendant.

University of North Carolina v. State National Bank

Opinion of the Court

Sjiith, C. J.

(after stating the facts). We have repeatedly ruled that under such circumstances, when a part of the issues or mat *652 ters in dispute are passed on, and others material to a disposition of the cause, left open, an appeal was premature and would not be entertained. The cases are numerous to this effect and we are content to refer to some of them. Hines v. Hines, 84 N. C., 122; Commissioners v. Satchwell, 88 N. C., 1; Jones v. Call, 89 N. C., 188; Grant v. Reese, 90 N. C., 3; Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N. C., 301.

In accordance with these adjudications the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered. Let this be certified to the Superior Court of "Wake.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.