Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.
Cases that cite this one
46 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Colyar v. Atlantic States Motor Lines, Inc. (N.C. 1949)
- Curlee v. Duke Power Co. (N.C. 1934)
- Tieffenbrun v. . Flannery (N.C. 1930)
- Tieffenbrun v. Flannery (N.C. 1930)
- Bolick v. American Barmag Corp. (N.C. 1982)
- Heaslip v. Treen (La. Ct. App. 1975)
- LaBruzza v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Insurance (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1962)
- Sweet v. Brown (La. Ct. App. 1960)
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Brown (La. Ct. App. 1959)
- Stroud v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey (La. Ct. App. 1949)
- Wilson v. Chastain (N.C. 1949)
- Webb v. . Eggleston (N.C. 1948)
- McCoy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (N.C. 1948)
- Webb v. Eggleston (N.C. 1948)
- Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co. (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1944)
- Winslow v. . Carolina Conference Association (N.C. 1937)
- George v. Atlanta & Charlotte Airline Railway Co. (N.C. 1936)
- Brister v. Wray-Dickinson Co. (La. Ct. App. 1935)
- Bigelow v. Otis (Mich. 1934)
- Bowery v. Babbit (Fla. 1930)
- City of Tulsa v. McIntosh (Okla. 1930)
- State Ex Rel. Stasciewicz v. Parks (Md. 1925)
- Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. Allen (Okla. 1924)
- Hollingsworth v. Schanland (La. 1924)
- King v. Mayor of Butte (Mont. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts). The action is brought under The Code, §1498, which provides, that “whenever the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default of another, such as would, if the injured party had lived, have entitled him to an action for damages therefor, the person or corporation that would have been so liable, and his or their executors, administrators, collectors or successors, shall be liable to an action for damages, to be brought within one year after such death, by the executor, administrator or collector of the decedent; and this nothwithstauding the death, and although the wrongful act, neglect or default, causing death, amount in law to a felony.”
This is not strictly a statute of limitation. It gives a right of action that would not otherwise exist, and the action to enforce it, must be brought within one year after the death of the testator or intestate, else the right of action will be lost. It must be *527 accepted in all respects as the Statute gives it. Why the action was not brought within the time does not appear, but any explanation in that respect would be unavailing, as there is no saving clause as to the time within which the action must be begun.
The nature of the cause of action, when it occurred, and when this action began, plainly appeared from the complaint and summons, and as more than one year elapsed after the death, of the intestate, and before the bringing of the action, it is clear it cannot be maintained, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.
No error. Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.