Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887

State v. . Rice

State v. . Rice
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 5, 1887 · MerrimoN
2 S.E. 180; 97 N.C. 421 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . Rice

Opinion of the Court

MerrimoN, J.,

(after stating the facts). We cannot distinguish this case from State v. Crenshaw, 94 N. C., 877, and State v. Cainan, Ibid., 883. In those cases, and that of Commissioners v. Harris, 7 Jones, 281, it was held that a town ordinance that left the fine or penalty to be imposed uncertain as to the amount of the same, was yoid for uncertainty. Here the fine to be imposed might be five dollars or any less sum. It was therefore uncertain, and the ordinance void.

There is no error. Let this opinion be certified to the Superior Court according to law. It is so ordered.

No error. Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.