Caldwell v. Stirewalt
Caldwell v. Stirewalt
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the case). The plaintiffs allege a cause of action, and the evidence produced by them in support of the motion for an injunction until the hearing upon the merits, tends strongly to prove, that the action is brought in good faith to obtain the relief demanded, and that the feme plaintiff may be entitled to have the same substantially.
On the contrary, while the answer admits some of the material allegations of the complaint, and other evidential facts, it denies others, and alleges matter in defence, and seriously puts in question the matter in litigation. As the matter is serious, and there is doubt, the feme defendant should not be allowed to collect or dispose of the notes in question, until the cause of action shall be litigated. The case is one that comes within the rule of equity applied in Harrison v. Bray, 92 N. C., 488; Coates v. Wilkes, Ib., 376; Ellett v. Newman, Ib., 519; Whittaker v. Hill, 96 N. C., 2; McElwee v. Blackwell, 94 N. C., 261; Lewis v. Lumber Company, 99 N. C., 11, decided at this term.
There is no error. Let this opinion be certified to the Superior Court, to the end that further steps may be taken in the action there, according to law. It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- L. C. CALDWELL and M. G. CALDWELL, his wife v. ELLA V. STIREWALT and C. L. SUMMERS
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published