Lindsey v. . Sanderlin

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Lindsey v. . Sanderlin, 10 S.E. 518 (N.C. 1889)
104 N.C. 331
Shepherd

Lindsey v. . Sanderlin

Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

The argument of the plaintiff’s counsel was addressed to the general character of his Honor’s charge in reference to negligence. We regret that we are precluded from passing upon that question. There is not only a failure to assign error (see McKinnon v. Morrison and Carlton v. R. R. Co., at this term), but the case expressly states that the instructions given were not excepted to.

The judgment, therefore, must be Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
A. H. Lindsey v. Thomas Sanderlin.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published