Lindsey v. . Sanderlin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Lindsey v. . Sanderlin, 10 S.E. 518 (N.C. 1889)
104 N.C. 331
Shepherd
Lindsey v. . Sanderlin
Opinion of the Court
The argument of the plaintiff’s counsel was addressed to the general character of his Honor’s charge in reference to negligence. We regret that we are precluded from passing upon that question. There is not only a failure to assign error (see McKinnon v. Morrison and Carlton v. R. R. Co., at this term), but the case expressly states that the instructions given were not excepted to.
The judgment, therefore, must be Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- A. H. Lindsey v. Thomas Sanderlin.
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published