Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889

Lindsey v. . Sanderlin

Lindsey v. . Sanderlin
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 5, 1889 · Shepherd
10 S.E. 518; 104 N.C. 331 (South Eastern Reporter)

Lindsey v. . Sanderlin

Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

The argument of the plaintiff’s counsel was addressed to the general character of his Honor’s charge in reference to negligence. We regret that we are precluded from passing upon that question. There is not only a failure to assign error (see McKinnon v. Morrison and Carlton v. R. R. Co., at this term), but the case expressly states that the instructions given were not excepted to.

The judgment, therefore, must be Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.