Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891

State v. . James

State v. . James
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 5, 1891 · <italic>Per Curiam:</italic>
13 S.E. 112; 108 N.C. 792 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . James

Opinion of the Court

This case was tried at Spring Term, 1890, of ALEXANDER. The appeal was docketed here at Fall Term, 1890. There was no application for certiorari at that term (Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N.C. 562), and no excuse is shown for the delay. Under the repeated decisions of this Court, we must direct the entry to be made.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Sondley v. Asheville, 110 N.C. 90; Graham v. Edwards,114 N.C. 230; Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N.C. 279; Norwood v. Pratt,124 N.C. 747; Benedict v. Jones, 131 N.C. 475; Mirror Co. v. Casualty Co.,157 N.C. 30; McLean v. McDonald, 175 N.C. 419; Howard v. Speight,180 N.C. 654.

(793)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.