Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892

State v. . Latham

State v. . Latham
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 5, 1892 · Shepherd
14 S.E. 390; 110 N.C. 490 (South Eastern Reporter)

State v. . Latham

Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

We are of the opinion that his Honor was clearly right in holding that the defendant was not guilty. *491 The Code, § 906, under which the indictment was drawn, does not provide that a Justice of the Peace shall make a report stating that he has had no .such final proceedings before him. If such had been the purpose of the Legislature, it would undoubtedly have said so. The statute only requires a return of such final criminal proceedings as may have been tried and disposed of. If no such proceedings have been had, how can the Justice furnish the Clerk “ with a list of the names and offences” of the parties tried before him?

We cannot stretch the plain letter of the law so as to make the failure to do an impossible thing an indictable offence.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.