Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894

In re Trotter

In re Trotter
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 5, 1894 · PER CURIAM.
20 S.E. 386; 115 N.C. 193 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. L. M. Scott, for Trotter, appellant., Messrs. King & Dillard, contra.

In re Trotter

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam :

We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.