Bank of Guilford v. Keogh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bank of Guilford v. Keogh, 19 S.E. 152 (N.C. 1894)
114 N.C. 262
PER CURIAM:
Bank of Guilford v. Keogh
Addendum
The plaintiff is so clearly entitled to recover of the appellants that we deem it unnecessary to discuss the several points presented on the appeal. Counsel with commendable candor was unable to insist with much earnestness upon any of the assignments of error to the rulings of the judge below. The judgment in both cases must be
Affirmed. *Page 169
(263)
Opinion of the Court
In two actions brought by the plaintiff, the one against Harriet A. Keogh, a feme covert, Thomas B. Keogh and E. L. Gilmer, and the other against the two last named, upon two separate notes signed by all of said parties, there was judgment in both cases for the plaintiff against the defendants, T. B. Keogh and Gilmer, at May Term, 1893, of GUILFORD, beforeBryan, J.
Defendants appealed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The BANK OF GUILFORD v. T. B. KEOGH Et Al.
- Status
- Published