Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894

Ulman v. . Mace

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided September 5, 1894 · Pee

20 S.E. 166; 115 N.C. 24 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Mr. O. R. Thomas, for plaintiffs., Mr. O. H. Quion, for defendant (appellant).

Opinion of the Court

Pee, Cukiam::

His Honor was probably unaware of the unreported case of Jones v. Craigmiles, 114 N. C., 613, in which it was held that the property should be described.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.