Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895

Futrell v. . Deanes

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 5, 1895 · FAIRCLOTH, C. J.

20 S.E. 1013; 116 N.C. 38 (South Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

L. L. Smith for plaintiffs . Winborne Lawrence for defendants .

Opinion of the Court

It appears from the record that the only question was, which party should pay the costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. S.v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, post, 184; Monroe v. Angel, post, 847; Elliottv. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438; Van Dyke v. Ins.Co., 174 N.C. 81.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.