Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895

Futrell v. Deanes

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 15, 1895 · Eairoloth

116 N.C. 38

Counsel

Mr. L. L. Smith, for plaintiffs., Messrs. Winlorne c& Lawrence, for defendants (appellants).

Opinion of the Court

Eairoloth, C. J.:

It appears from tbe record that tbe only question was which party should pay tbe costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. State v. Railroad, 74 N. C., 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N. C., 93.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.