Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896

Schulhofer v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Schulhofer v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 15, 1896 · Clark
118 N.C. 1096

Counsel

Messrs. Ferguson db Ferguson, for plaintiff (appellant.), Messrs. G. F. Bason and J. M. Moody, for defendant.

Schulhofer v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

Opinion of the Court

ClarK, J.:

The cause of action could be sustained either for damages for breach of the contract of safe delivery, or in tort for negligence. The plaintiff having brought the action before a justice of the peace “ for $190, due by contract,” evidently elected to sue ex contractu. "When the action can be fairly treated as based either on contract or in tort, the courts, in favor of jurisdiction, will sustain the ■election made by the plaintiff. Brittain v. Payne, at this Term; Bowers v. Railroad, 107 N. C., 721; Stokes v. Taylor, 104 N. C., 394.

The judgment dismissing the action is

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.