Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works, 28 S.E. 192 (N.C. 1897)
121 N.C. 91
Faircloth

Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works

Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

The plaintiff sued for a penalty • of $200, before a Justice of the Peace, and the defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and pleaded the statute of limitations. On appeal in the Superior Court, the plaintiff asked leave to amend his complaint by inserting a second, cause of action, which was refused. He claimed the right,. *92 as of course, under The Code, Sec. 272. The motion, coming after the time for answering had expired and after answer had been filed, was too late, as a matter of course. The privilege of amending pleadings is at the discretion of the court, and its decision is not reviewable. Commissioners of Alamance v. Blair, 76 N. C., 136; Kron v. Smith, 96 N. C., 389; Clark’s Code, pp. 220.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
W. H. J. Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate and Fertilizer Works.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published