Pender v. . Mallett

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Pender v. . Mallett, 30 S.E. 324 (N.C. 1898)
122 N.C. 163; 1898 N.C. LEXIS 216
Clark

Pender v. . Mallett

Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

The Court overruled the demurrer, gave the defendant time till the 20th May, to file answer, and ordered that defendants appear before the Clerk to be examined under oath concerning the matters set out in the pleadings, Code, Section 580 et seq. The defendant excepted to the order and the judgment, but the Court being of opinion that an appeal did not lie, noted the *164 exception and directed the Clerk not now to send up a transcript. The defendants thereupon applied, after notice to the plaintiff, to this Court for a certiorari. It is true that an appeal from the order of examination is premature and will not lie. Vann v. Lawrence, 111 N. C., 32; Holt v. Warehouse Co., 116 N. C., 480. But an appeal lies from the judgment overruling a demurrer. Commissioners v. Magnin, 78 N. C., 181; Ramsay v. Railroad, 91 N. C., 418, and they are decisive of this application. The hearing here was complicated with other matters which have no bearing upon the sole question before us, which is as to the defendant’s right to appeal at this stage of the case. The certiorari will issue, but it will not suspend the order of examination of defendants.

Motion allowed.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOHN R. PENDER, Receiver v. J. P. MALLETT Et Al.
Cited By
14 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Practice — Appeal—Demurrer—Order for Examination Under Section 580 of The Code. 1. An appeal lies from a judgment overruling a demurrer. 2. A party caenot appeal from an order to appear before the Clerk to be examined under oath concerning the matters set out in the pleadings as provided in Section 580 et. seq. of The Code.