Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1899

316 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1899.

  • Straughan v. . Tysor 32 S.E. 557, (N.C. 1899)
  • Troxler v. . R. R. 32 S.E. 550, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. . Warren 32 S.E. 552, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. . Taylor 32 S.E. 548, (N.C. 1899)
  • Clark v. . Benton 32 S.E. 556, (N.C. 1899)
  • Clark v. . Benton 32 S.E. 555, (N.C. 1899)
  • Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R. 32 S.E. 681, (N.C. 1899)
  • Mitchell v. . R. R. 32 S.E. 671, (N.C. 1899)
  • Hancock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. 32 S.E. 679, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. . Lucas 32 S.E. 553, (N.C. 1899)
  • Bear v. Commissioners of Brunswick County 32 S.E. 558, (N.C. 1899)
  • Dillon v. City of Raleigh 32 S.E. 548, (N.C. 1899)
  • Troxler v. Southern Railway Co. 124 N.C. 189, (N.C. 1899)
  • Mitchell v. Carolina Central Railroad 124 N.C. 236, (N.C. 1899)
  • Bank v. Burlington 124 N.C. 251, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. Taylor 124 N.C. 803, (N.C. 1899)
  • City of Greensboro v. Williams 32 S.E. 492, (N.C. 1899)
  • Bragaw v. . Supreme Lodge 32 S.E. 544, (N.C. 1899)
  • Perdue v. . Perdue 32 S.E. 492, (N.C. 1899)
  • Ex Parte Yancey 32 S.E. 491, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. . Robinson 32 S.E. 494, (N.C. 1899)
  • Farmers Bank v. Hunt, Paylor & Co. 32 S.E. 546, (N.C. 1899)
  • White v. . Boyd 32 S.E. 495, (N.C. 1899)
  • Markham v. . McCown 32 S.E. 494, (N.C. 1899)
  • Bragaw v. Supreme Lodge Knights & Ladies of Honor 124 N.C. 154, (N.C. 1899)
  • White v. Boyd 124 N.C. 177, (N.C. 1899)
  • Ins. Co. v. . Edwards 32 S.E. 404, (N.C. 1899)
  • Stratford v. City of Greensboro 32 S.E. 394, (N.C. 1899)
  • Redditt v. Singer Manufacturing Co. 32 S.E. 392, (N.C. 1899)
  • Phillips v. Southern Railway Co. 32 S.E. 388, (N.C. 1899)
  • Parks v. Southern Railway Co. 32 S.E. 387, (N.C. 1899)
  • Pierce v. . R. R. 32 S.E. 399, (N.C. 1899)
  • Johnson v. . Blake 32 S.E. 397, (N.C. 1899)
  • Beckwith, Ex Parte 32 S.E. 393, (N.C. 1899)
  • Pierce v. North Carolina R. R. 124 N.C. 83, (N.C. 1899)
  • Commonwealth Mutual Fire Insurance v. Edwards 124 N.C. 116, (N.C. 1899)
  • Beddard v. . Harrington 32 S.E. 377, (N.C. 1899)
  • Roscoe v. John L. Roper Lumber Co. 32 S.E. 389, (N.C. 1899)
  • Stancell v. . Burgwyn 32 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1899)
  • Capehart v. . Burrus 32 S.E. 378, (N.C. 1899)
  • Cox v. Beaufort County Lumber Co. 32 S.E. 381, (N.C. 1899)
  • Temple v. . Insurance Co. 32 S.E. 380, (N.C. 1899)
  • Royster v. . Stallings 32 S.E. 384, (N.C. 1899)
  • Christian v. . Yarborough 32 S.E. 383, (N.C. 1899)
  • State v. . Fulford 32 S.E. 377, (N.C. 1899)
  • Powell v. . Weatherington 32 S.E. 380, (N.C. 1899)
  • Ridley v. Railroad 32 S.E. 379, (N.C. 1899)
  • Temple v. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n 124 N.C. 66, (N.C. 1899)
  • Sharpe v. . Loane Co. 32 S.E. 318, (N.C. 1899)
  • Howell v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad 32 S.E. 317, (N.C. 1899)
« Prev 1 … 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑