Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1902

314 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1902.

  • Dawson v. Baxter. 42 S.E. 456, (N.C. 1902)
  • Best v. British & American Mortgage Co. 42 S.E. 456, (N.C. 1902)
  • Taylor v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad 42 S.E. 464, (N.C. 1902)
  • Parker v. Cobb. 42 S.E. 531, (N.C. 1902)
  • Duffy v. Meadows. 42 S.E. 460, (N.C. 1902)
  • Jester v. . Steam Packet Co. 42 S.E. 447, (N.C. 1902)
  • Phelps v. Windsor Steamboat Co. 42 S.E. 335, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Tuten. 42 S.E. 443, (N.C. 1902)
  • Walker v. Brinkley. 42 S.E. 333, (N.C. 1902)
  • Monds v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co. 42 S.E. 334, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Knotts. 42 S.E. 444, (N.C. 1902)
  • Carter v. White. 42 S.E. 442, (N.C. 1902)
  • Taylor v. Brinkley. 42 S.E. 336, (N.C. 1902)
  • Wolfe v. Hampton. 42 S.E. 332, (N.C. 1902)
  • Goodyear v. Cook. 42 S.E. 332, (N.C. 1902)
  • Alleghany Co. v. East Coast Lumber Co. 42 S.E. 331, (N.C. 1902)
  • Meekins v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad 42 S.E. 333, (N.C. 1902)
  • In the Matter of the Txn. of the Salaries of Judges 42 S.E. 970, (N.C. 1902)
  • Ferebee v. Lake Drummond Canal & Water Co. 130 N.C. 745, (N.C. 1902)
  • Williams v. Drummond Water & Canal Co. 130 N.C. 746, (N.C. 1902)
  • Sparkman v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 41 S.E. 881, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hardwood Log Co. v. Coffin 41 S.E. 931, (N.C. 1902)
  • Curtis v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 929, (N.C. 1902)
  • Johnson v. . Machine Works 41 S.E. 882, (N.C. 1902)
  • Jackson v. . Corporation Commission 42 S.E. 123, (N.C. 1902)
  • Jones v. . Commissioners 42 S.E. 144, (N.C. 1902)
  • Jackson v. Corporation Commission 130 N.C. 385, (N.C. 1902)
  • Johnson v. Machine Works 130 N.C. 441, (N.C. 1902)
  • Jones v. Commissioners of Franklin County 130 N.C. 451, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Wiseman 41 S.E. 884, (N.C. 1902)
  • Pinnix v. City of Durham 41 S.E. 932, (N.C. 1902)
  • In Re Drewery 41 S.E. 937, (N.C. 1902)
  • Moore v. . Moore 41 S.E. 943, (N.C. 1902)
  • Balk v. Harris. 41 S.E. 940, (N.C. 1902)
  • Smith v. Atlanta & Charlotte Railroad 42 S.E. 139, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hooker v. Town of Greenville. 42 S.E. 141, (N.C. 1902)
  • Frazier v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 941, (N.C. 1902)
  • Rice v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad 41 S.E. 1031, (N.C. 1902)
  • Moore v. Moore 130 N.C. 333, (N.C. 1902)
  • Finger v. Hunter. 41 S.E. 890, (N.C. 1902)
  • Coble v. Beall. 41 S.E. 793, (N.C. 1902)
  • Faulkner v. King. 41 S.E. 885, (N.C. 1902)
  • Harper v. Anderson. 41 S.E. 1021, (N.C. 1902)
  • McCord v. Southern Railway Co. 41 S.E. 886, (N.C. 1902)
  • Hallyburton v. Slagle. 41 S.E. 877, (N.C. 1902)
  • Millhiser v. Marr. 41 S.E. 872, (N.C. 1902)
  • State v. Frank 41 S.E. 785, (N.C. 1902)
  • Bank v. Carr. 41 S.E. 876, (N.C. 1902)
  • Johnson v. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad 41 S.E. 794, (N.C. 1902)
  • Phillips v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. 41 S.E. 1022, (N.C. 1902)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑