Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /North Carolina /Cases /Supreme Court of North Carolina /

1903

385 Supreme Court of North Carolina opinions from 1903.

  • Seawell v. Carolina Central Railroad 44 S.E. 610, (N.C. 1903)
  • Ray v. Long. 44 S.E. 652, (N.C. 1903)
  • Lewis v. Clyde Steamship Co. 44 S.E. 666, (N.C. 1903)
  • Cox v. Wall. 44 S.E. 635, (N.C. 1903)
  • Fisher v. Western Carolina Bank 44 S.E. 601, (N.C. 1903)
  • Johnston v. Case. 44 S.E. 617, (N.C. 1903)
  • Lee v. Baird. 44 S.E. 605, (N.C. 1903)
  • Featherstone v. Carr. 44 S.E. 592, (N.C. 1903)
  • Revell v. Thrash. 44 S.E. 596, (N.C. 1903)
  • Morgan v. Bostic. 44 S.E. 639, (N.C. 1903)
  • Ritchie v. Fowler. 44 S.E. 616, (N.C. 1903)
  • Henderson v. Durham Traction Co. 44 S.E. 598, (N.C. 1903)
  • Fritz v. Southern Railway Co. 44 S.E. 613, (N.C. 1903)
  • Smith v. . R. R. 44 S.E. 663, (N.C. 1903)
  • Patton v. Cooper. 44 S.E. 676, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. Boone. 44 S.E. 595, (N.C. 1903)
  • Cone v. Hyatt. 44 S.E. 678, (N.C. 1903)
  • Finishing & Warehouse Co. v. Ozment 44 S.E. 681, (N.C. 1903)
  • Smith v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co. 132 N.C. 819, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. . Hall 44 S.E. 553, (N.C. 1903)
  • Lyman v. Southern Railway Co. 44 S.E. 550, (N.C. 1903)
  • Higdon v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 44 S.E. 558, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. Hall 132 N.C. 1094, (N.C. 1903)
  • Harris v. Davenport. 44 S.E. 406, (N.C. 1903)
  • Orr v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 44 S.E. 401, (N.C. 1903)
  • Dale v. Southern Railway Co. 44 S.E. 399, (N.C. 1903)
  • Fleming v. Southern Railway Co. 44 S.E. 551, (N.C. 1903)
  • Bray v. Roper Lumber Co. 44 S.E. 403, (N.C. 1903)
  • Maynard v. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia 44 S.E. 405, (N.C. 1903)
  • Hayes v. United States Fire Insurance 44 S.E. 404, (N.C. 1903)
  • Howard v. Southern Railway Co. 44 S.E. 401, (N.C. 1903)
  • Fisher v. Owens. 44 S.E. 369, (N.C. 1903)
  • Menzel v. Hinton. 44 S.E. 385, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. Cole. 44 S.E. 391, (N.C. 1903)
  • Doggett v. Hardin. 44 S.E. 369, (N.C. 1903)
  • Caudle v. Long. 44 S.E. 368, (N.C. 1903)
  • Morrow v. Cole. 44 S.E. 370, (N.C. 1903)
  • Smith v. Huffman. 44 S.E. 113, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. Bradley. 44 S.E. 122, (N.C. 1903)
  • Pipes v. North Carolina Mica Mineral & Lumber Co. 44 S.E. 114, (N.C. 1903)
  • Snider v. Newell. 44 S.E. 354, (N.C. 1903)
  • Harrill v. . R. R. 44 S.E. 109, (N.C. 1903)
  • McEntyre v. Levi Cotton Mills 44 S.E. 109, (N.C. 1903)
  • State v. Mehaffey. 44 S.E. 107, (N.C. 1903)
  • Wiggins v. Pender. 44 S.E. 362, (N.C. 1903)
  • Carolina & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Pennearden Lumber & M'f'g Co. 44 S.E. 358, (N.C. 1903)
  • Gross v. Smith. 44 S.E. 111, (N.C. 1903)
  • McBrayer v. Haynes. 44 S.E. 115, (N.C. 1903)
  • Harrill v. South Carolina & Georgia Extension Railway of North Carolina 132 N.C. 655, (N.C. 1903)
  • Hitch v. Commissioners of Edgecombe County 44 S.E. 30, (N.C. 1903)
« Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑