Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907

Hughes v. . Crooker

Hughes v. . Crooker
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Decided February 19, 1907 · PER CURIAM.
56 S.E. 510; 144 N.C. 764 (South Eastern Reporter)
Hughes v. . Crooker

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The Court below, has found as a fact that the defendant is a non-resident of -North Carolina, and we find there is sufficient evidence to support such finding. The motion to dissolve the attachment was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.